why did snape put the sword in the lake

This Patronus is in the form of a stag. No one can just take it and use it or it will simply disappear and go back to its original holding place. This gets revealed later in part 2 of Deathly Hallows after Snape dies and Harry is looking into his pensive. If Harry had seen him, he probably would have tried to kill him because of what snape did to Dumbledore. Thank you for clearing that up :). He then produces his Patronus to lead Harry to the spot. ...find the sword of Godric Gryffindor in some random ass pond? It's the reason why Rowling decided to have Snape put the sword in the lake in the forest for Harry to find in the original story. Professor Snape learns of Harry and Ron’s whereabouts from asking the portrait of Phineas Nigellus Black. In other words, "It matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be." Again, he was only put in the position to protect the children from the Death Eaters. Press J to jump to the feed. This one actually has more complicated magic involving the person wishing to obtain it needing to demonstrate Gryffindor values of bravery. The sword of Godric is a magical artefact beholden to Hogwarts. In Harry Potter, why did Snape put the Sword of Gryffindor at the bottom of a frozen lake, as opposed to making it easy for Harry/Ron to get it? It's possible it would just be a regular sword in their hands, or that it would return to its resting place at Hogwarts. If Snape sent the patronus while Dumbledore was still alive why did it get to the lake so much later? In Harry Potter’s magical world, nothing is as it seems—and that goes for the books themselves. Snape put the sword in the pool because he couldn't let Harry see him, because Harry still thought he was on the bad side. I don't think it would've been very hard to keep tabs on them somehow. I do recommend doing some google searches on it though. You have to display Gryffindor values and be in need of the sword to be allowed to use it for as long as your need exists. He needed to be a double agent in Voldemort's ranks in order to be able to help Harry & Co on their quest, such as when he sent his doe Patronus to the lake where he hid the sword of Godric Gryffindor. It's like Ask Science, but for all universes other than our own. Sry for bad english :-), New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the harrypotter community. And after Ron showed up again to save Harry at the frozen lake, he mentions having seen a hint of movement between a pair of trees in the distance -- it's implied Snape was there the whole time, to put the sword in the lake and control the Patronus that led Harry to it. As Snape put in the Gryffindor sword down there in the lake, he would have made sure that retrieving the sword would not have been easy. Do not forget that it must be taken under conditions of need and valor — and he must not know that you give it! Dobby smiled brightly. Idk but that's why Snape put at the bottom of Lake because it had to be a test for some reason. It was confirmed that the sword in the lake was, in fact, the real sword of Gryffindor because Ronald Weasley was able to kill the horcrux locket that tried to kill Harry at the lake. He didn’t do it to be a dick and to make it harder for Harry, he did it because in order to wield Gryffindor’s Sword, one has to make a display of bravery. Unknown to Bellatrix, that sword was only a replica. The logic as far as I understood it was that Harry had to perform a feat of bravery to claim the sword. After Dumbledore’s death, Dumbledore’s portrait instructs Professor Snape to put the sword in the lake for Harry and Ron to find. The sword of Gryffindor was made a thousand years ago by goblins, the magical world's most skilled metalworkers, and is therefore enchanted. This Patronus is in the form of a stag. Which makes sense if he was trying to conjure it from the Sorting Hat but makes less sense when it is physically in his area. Because it's much more reasonable that Snape cast the patronus in the forest after placing the sword in the pond. The sword of Godric is a magical artefact beholden to Hogwarts. “Now, Severus, the sword! Harry and Hermione travel back in time to when they were standing on the other side of the lake. He is the one who journeys to the Forest of Dean and leaves the sword in the lake. We don't know what would happen if someone "unworthy " tried to wield it. Godric Gryffindor's name is engraved just beneath the hilt.The sword was made to Godric Gryffindor's specifi… Hence Past-Harry sees a stag on other side of the lake. Hence Past-Harry sees a stag on other side of the lake… Future-Harry sees that Dementors are sucking the souls of Harry and Sirius and casts the Patronus. ... why'd you have to put the sword in the freaking water. But this is the kind of magic that is subtle, and significantly more powerful than anything you can do with a wand. Welcome to r/HarryPotter, the place where fans from around the world can meet and discuss everything in the Harry Potter universe! It's clear that Snape is a powerful wizard but wouldn't have a lot of the experience that most other headmasters did. Harry is actually rather good at understanding this kind of magic, which is why he tells Ron (who actually retrieved the sword) to use it against the locket. Harry Potter's Patronus is a stag. He didn’t do it to be a dick and to make it harder for Harry, he did it because in order to wield Gryffindor’s Sword, one has to make a display of bravery. As Ron and Hermione emerged, spluttering and gasping, from the depths of the lake, the dragon flew on, its wings beating hard, and landed at last on a distant bank. I've seen the movies but haven't read the books 6 & 7 so it might be explained in there somewhere. He put it at the bottom of a frozen lake and then led him to it with his patronus. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, It does not do to dwell on dreams and forget to live. Snape casts the Patronus in Dumbledore's office to show him that he still cares for Lily. It's the reason why Rowling decided to have Snape put the sword in the lake in the forest for Harry to find in the original story. This is pretty much the definitive answer. Deluminator (Put-Outer) ... Rowling has confirmed that Gryffindor did not steal the sword from Ragnuk and that this belief is merely part of Griphook's goblin mistrust and prejudice against wizards. In Harry Potter, why did Snape put the Sword of Gryffindor at the bottom of a frozen lake, as opposed to making it easy for Harry/Ron to get it? Who put the sword in the lake? Fashioned from pure silver, it is inset with rubies, the stone that represents Gryffindor in the hour-glasses that count the house points at Hogwarts. The dragon did not seem to have noticed anything; it was already fifty feet away, swooping low over the lake to scoop up water in its scarred snout. Snape put it in the pond. Snape has to make sure Harry was able to get the sword without directly communicating with him in any way (because of the mind connection to LV) and had to establish some sort of bravery test. I get that he didn’t want to just walk up to him and reveal himself, but surely there was a slightly less complicated way? Snape was not present in the showdown at the Ministry of Magic at the end of book 5, so he may not know that Harry has already cast an Unforgivable Curse. ... Deathly Hallows that the Sword of Gryffindor is supposed to be in Bellatrix Lestrange's vault, placed there by Severus Snape. In Harry Potter’s magical world, nothing is as it seems—and that goes for the books themselves. And after Ron showed up again to save Harry at the frozen lake, he mentions having seen a hint of movement between a pair of trees in the distance -- it's implied Snape was there the whole time, to put the sword in the lake and control the Patronus that led Harry to it. Later, when the trio is travelling to find the 'cruxes he hides the sword in a pond and sends the patronus to help them find it. Snape didn't place the sword into the vault himself; he handed the (fake) sword to Bellatrix (presumably, or to her husband, or to her brother-in-law, it makes no difference), and they went to Gringotts and ordered it to be put in their vault — which was personally done by Griphook, in the one single time he went to the Lestrange's vault. He also learns that Snape's doe Patronus, after Lily's own Patronus, appeared to Harry in the woods and guided him towards Gryffindor's sword. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Snape also had to kill Dumbledore to remain a trusted Death Eater, and Voldemort's right hand. None of this information is addressed in the … Like would the sword have done nothing if Snape has just stabbed it into a tree? … A/N We know the story of Arthur and how he pulled the sword out of the stone, but another version of the story is when the Lady of the Lake handed the sword over to Merlin (or Arthur, depending on which legend). The portrait heard Hermione say where she was, went and told snape, Snape showed up and placed the sword, cast the patronus. Snape found out where harry is from mr black, seriuses grand grandfather, he is on picture in hogwarts an can travel to his picture in grimauld place, but hermione took that pic with them, and mr black overheard them that they are in that specific forest so that is how snape found out, he went to the forest, casted patronus and watched harry from the trees. But not this one. Harry and Hermione travel back in time to when they were standing on the other side of the lake. If Snape sent the patronus while Dumbledore was still alive why did it get to the lake so much later? No one can just take it and use it or it will simply disappear and go back to its … While this isn't wrong, its not really on-topic for the post. "You could put the sword in there for Harry Potter to find!" Trans rights are human rights. Plus, Snape … As for the lake, all Snape had to do was melt a small bit of the ice, suspend the sword in the water, and freeze the ice back over with his wand. Then there is the whole not wanting to be seen by Harry or Ron. Diving into a frozen lake was about as good as could be expected, although Harry made it extra interesting by wearing a Horcrux around his neck while doing so. Rowling has confirmed in her webchat that Gryffindor did not steal the sword from Ragnuk and that this belief is merely part of Griphook's goblin mistrust and prejudice against wizards. How would Snape even know Harry would be there? We use a [Watsonian point of view](http://fanlore.org/wiki/Watsonian_vs._Doylist), versus Doylist. Snape showed him that memory to let Harry know he was the one who put the sword in the lake … Snape’s feelings regarding Harry are irrelevant to him placing the sword in the bottom of the lake though. Very good!” cried the portrait of Dumbledore behind the headmaster’s chair. Like the others have mentioned, it needs an act of bravery to work in some fashion. Snape- You are aware that the sword must be taken with bravery? He also has a portrait in the Headmaster's office. I thought that as well when I saw the movie, I kept thinking "how on earth did the Patronus get there and why did it take so long??" 12 days ago. There are many interesting connections to be made through … A lot of the info I've looked up says Snape did send the pond Patronus in Dumbledore's office when he was taking the sword of Gryyfindor, but I can't understand 1) how they would know exactly where harry would be & 2) why he had to sent the patronus in the future? It shows that Snape's patronus was a doe just like the one woman he truly loved: Lily Potter. He put the sword in the lake where Harry was and sent his patronus to Harry so that he can go to the sword and get it When Harry looks in the Pensieve he seems Snape casting a patronus in Dumbledore's office, but the patronus doesn't get to the lake & Harry months until after Dumbledore dies so how is this possible? Snape's timely spell-casting prevents Harry from uttering an Unforgivable Curse. After reading the book, it's clear that in the office, he only was showing his Patronus to make a point that it was a doe, like Lily's, and he later casts the Patronus to take Harry to the pond (I don't want to give much else away since you haven't read that yet), Oh, that makes so much sense! Though they’ve said in the films the sword finds its way to those who need it most/in their time …  He was tracking Harry/Hermione by the portrait in her bag. Professor Snape then plants the sword in the lake. But honestly, Snape has a love-hate relationship with Harry, and would get a chuckle out of him diving into a freezing lake. Someone help! Be sorted, earn house points, take classes with our fine Hogwarts staff, debate which actor portrayed Dumbledore the best, and finally get some closure for your Post-Potter Depression. Is it possible that the patronus he sent in the office wasn't the pond patronus? But not too much as to actually hurt them. The other scene with Snape's patronus, where Harry is in the woods, happened after Dumbledore died. "Dobby, its January. ... Basically this, snape put the sword there, even in splitting the film in two they missed (or changed) quite a few things. Who stole the Gryffindor sword? The answer to most questions of this kind are usually just Snape is a huge asshole. Snape placed the Sword in the lake then cast the Patronus to guide Harry to where the sword was. Snape casts the Patronus in Dumbledore's office to show him that he still cares for Lily. The house colors represent the elements. I know that Snape's patronus is a doe so he must have been the one trying to give Harry the sword, but why there and how and when? If Voldemort should read Harry’s mind and see you acting for him —”, — Deathly Hallows, chapter 33 (The Prince’s Tale). Or did I miss something. Future-Harry sees that Dementors are sucking the souls of Harry and Sirius and casts the Patronus. After Dumbledore’s death, Dumbledore’s portrait instructs Professor Snape to put the sword in the lake for Harry and Ron to find. Snape’s feelings regarding Harry are irrelevant to him placing the sword in the bottom of the lake though. And running a whole school while playing lapdog to Voldemort. If Snape just left the sword lying around for Harry to pick up, it’s magic either wouldn’t have worked or it would have returned to it’s place in Hogwarts (it’s unclear on the specifics here). The house colors represent the elements. The patronus he cast in Dumbledore's office in the Pensieve is only to show him (Dumbledore) the form of his patronus, which is still a doe, which proves he still loves Lily. Snape showed him that memory to let Harry know he was the one who put the sword in the lake and led Harry to it. He threw it in the lake because it was near where they were camping. Press J to jump to the feed. Hermione had taken the portrait of Phineas Black from Grimmald Place and put it in her purse. As /u/benigndepressedbear mentioned, to properly claim the sword, Harry couldn't just pluck it out of a tree. How would Snape even know Harry would be there? He hadn't even noticed that the elf had walked away, though Severus realized that he should have from the dead silence. There are deep (biblical) reason behind this that I won't spell out here to prevent my AN from becoming longer than this story's chapter. Well he was probably pretty busy beating kids just enough to blend in.

Apple Music Template Blank, Best 14 Day Detox, Adjectives For Sports Person, Hey Girl Hey Girl Say Babe Say Babe Song, What Does The Government Owe Its Citizens, Kitchenaid 4 Burner Gas Cooktop, Youtube Gabrielle Reece, Theme Park Deaths Uk, How To Make A Fiesta Salad,